Home Who We Work With How It Works Audit Checklist Get in Touch
Home Clients Process Checklist Contact
Home Who We Work With

Who We Work With

The audit is designed for development teams and individual developers who are close to a release and want structured, independent feedback on the state of their codebase.

Small Development Teams

Teams of two to eight engineers often have internal code review practices, but those reviews happen within the context of shared knowledge and shared assumptions. An external reviewer doesn't carry those assumptions. They read the code the way a new hire would on their first week — or the way a security researcher would.

Small teams approaching a major release, a significant version bump, or a handoff to a new technical lead are well-positioned to benefit from an independent audit. The findings report also serves as useful documentation for onboarding new team members.

  • Teams releasing a major version (1.0, 2.0, significant new module)
  • Teams preparing for a technical handoff
  • Teams whose internal review process has gaps in security or performance expertise

Startup Engineering Teams

Early-stage startups move fast. That speed is often appropriate — shipping matters more than perfection in the early stages. But when a startup reaches the point of a significant public launch, an enterprise pilot, or a fundraising milestone, the state of the codebase starts to matter more. An audit at this stage provides a clear picture of what was accumulated during the fast-build phase and what needs to be addressed before the stakes get higher.

  • Startups preparing for a public launch after private beta
  • Teams preparing for due diligence or investor technical review
  • Startups transitioning from MVP to production-grade product
  • Teams expanding from one platform to two

Agencies Building for Clients

Development agencies sometimes bring in external reviewers before delivering a project to a client. An independent audit provides a layer of quality assurance that the agency's own team cannot fully provide — not because of skill, but because of proximity to the work. The findings report also gives the client confidence that the delivered product has been reviewed by someone with no stake in the outcome.

  • Agencies delivering a mobile app to a client for the first time
  • Agencies whose client has requested independent quality assurance
  • Agencies preparing a handoff package that includes technical documentation

What the Audit Is Designed For

Well-suited for the audit

  • Apps with a defined codebase ready for review (not still in early design)
  • Teams with a release date in mind, giving time for remediation after findings
  • iOS, Android, React Native, or Flutter codebases
  • Apps that handle user data, authentication, or network communication
  • Codebases where the team wants a written record of technical state

Less suited for the audit

  • Apps in early prototype stage where architecture is still being decided
  • Teams looking for someone to write fixes rather than document findings
  • Projects where the team cannot provide codebase access in the required format
  • Apps with no defined release timeline where findings would have no actionable context

Send Us Your Project Details

Use the contact form to describe your app, your platform, and your release timeline. We'll review the details and follow up to discuss whether the audit is a good fit.